ScrutoraYour control register says encrypted. Who checked the code?
A GRC platform records that a control is claimed and who signed off. It has no way to know whether the software actually behaves that way, because it has never read the software.
Underneath your GRC tool, not instead of it.
Control frameworks, ownership, evidence requests, policy lifecycle, auditor collaboration. Genuinely useful, and not what we do.
Almost every technical control is verified by an attestation or a screenshot. Both are claims about the system, made by a person, at a moment.
The same control, evaluated against the code and the cloud, continuously, with the file and line behind the answer.
Two sentences that sound the same.
The second one is worse news and a better position. It is also the only one of the two that tells anybody what to do on Monday.
Exports, not another dashboard to check.
Findings go to your code host and your pipeline. Engineers never have to open our UI to do the work.
Exportable as JSON or CSV, pre-filled from code, with the policy fields left to you.
One asset, as of one date, joining the data map to the cloud position and the consent record.
Verify one control for real.
A public repository, read once and not kept. You get the data map: every personal-data field, where it lands, and who receives it. Or run the container on your own runner, and the source never reaches us.